Atari VCS 400 GPU vs Radeon Pro VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.80no data
Power efficiency9.22no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 20Banded Kestrel
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)14 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840192
Core clock speed1400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1201 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate408.014.41
Floating-point processing power13.06 TFLOPS0.4612 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs24012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length305 mm295 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2020 14 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Pro VII has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Atari VCS 400 GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro VII and Atari VCS 400 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro VII is a workstation graphics card while Atari VCS 400 GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU
Atari VCS 400 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1548 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atari VCS 400 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.