Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro Duo

Place in the ranking	262	166
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.80	6.86
Power efficiency	4.20	12.59
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Capsaicin	GP104
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Design	reference	no data
Release date	26 April 2016 (8 years ago)	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P5000 has 43% better value for money than Pro Duo.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2048
Compute units	128	no data
Core clock speed	no data	1607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1733 MHz
Number of transistors	8,900 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	256.0	277.3
Floating-point processing power	8.192 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	277 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	3x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1127 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort support	+	-
Display Port	no data	1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
Enduro	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-
Optimus	-	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12
Shader Model	6.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Duo 21.29

Quadro P5000 32.85
+54.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Duo 8183

Quadro P5000 12624
+54.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60−65 −63.3%	98 +63.3%
4K	24−27 −66.7%	40 +66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	24.98 +2.1%	25.50 −2.1%
4K	62.46 +0%	62.48 +0%

Pro Duo and Quadro P5000 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p
Pro Duo and Quadro P5000 have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Dota 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Fortnite	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Dota 2	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Valorant	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
World of Tanks	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Dota 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Fortnite	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

This is how Pro Duo and Quadro P5000 compete in popular games:

Quadro P5000 is 63% faster in 1080p
Quadro P5000 is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.29	32.85
Recency	26 April 2016	1 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	100 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 54.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Duo in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.