Arc Pro A60M vs Radeon Pro Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking256not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.39no data
Power efficiency4.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCapsaicinDG2-256
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date26 April 2016 (8 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Compute units128no data
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate256.0166.4
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length277 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors3x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
Enduro+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2016 6 June 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 95 Watt

Arc Pro A60M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 268.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo is a workstation card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
Intel Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 3622 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.