Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 April 2017 (7 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
| Current price | $173 (0.2x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 179.0 | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,728 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 305 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
Supported GPU Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | no data |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 24 April 2017 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
