GeForce RTX 5090 vs Radeon Pro 5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking180not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.22no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 10GB202
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230421760
Core clock speed1243 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate194.41,714
Floating-point processing power6.221 TFLOPS109.7 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs144680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s1.52 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-10.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 500 Watt

Pro 5700 has 284.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 397 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.