GeForce RTX 4050 vs Radeon Pro 5700

Place in the ranking	179	122
Place by popularity	not in top-100	41
Power efficiency	16.41	26.02
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 10	AD107
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)	2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2560
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	2505 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2640 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	194.4	211.2
Floating-point processing power	6.221 TFLOPS	13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	144	80
Tensor Cores	no data	120
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5700 30.70

RTX 4050 37.43
+21.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5700 11844

RTX 4050 14439
+21.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.70	37.43
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	100 Watt

Pro 5700 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 21.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.