GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.61no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 10G92
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)21 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed1243 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate239.846.40
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPS0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16064
L2 Cache4 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 21 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 125 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

9800 GT Rebrand, on the other hand, has 4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 60 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 XT or GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.