ATI Radeon X300 SE vs Pro 5700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.65no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 10RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed1499 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate239.81.300
Floating-point processing power7.675 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1604
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 30 Watt

Pro 5700 XT has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1471.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X300 SE, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon X300 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
ATI Radeon X300 SE
Radeon X300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 60 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 29 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5700 XT or Radeon X300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.