GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs Radeon Pro W5700
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 169 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.27 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.70 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | G92 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 November 2019 (6 years ago) | 21 July 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $160 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 754 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 | 46.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.893 TFLOPS | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 16 |
| TMUs | 144 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 64 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 305 mm | 229 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 November 2019 | 21 July 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 125 Watt |
Pro W5700 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
9800 GT Rebrand, on the other hand, has 64% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
