GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 570

Place in performance ranking	308	44
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.70	no data
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Polaris 20	GN21-X9
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 June 2017 (6 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$356	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	7424
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1860 MHz
Boost clock speed	1105 MHz	2280 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	123.8	386.3
Floating-point performance	3,584 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 570 and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	217.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −249%	157 +249%
1440p	30−35 −250%	105 +250%
4K	21−24 −252%	74 +252%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.39	53.01
Recency	5 June 2017	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	150 Watt