Radeon RX 6550S vs Pro 555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking574not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 24
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed850 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80153.6
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS4.915 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4864
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache192 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

RX 6550S has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and Radeon RX 6550S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6550S is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
AMD Radeon RX 6550S
Radeon RX 6550S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 97 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555 or Radeon RX 6550S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.