GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs Radeon Pro 570

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking324not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 20GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179216
Core clock speed1000 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1105 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate123.84.160
Floating-point processing power3.96 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 31 Watt

Pro 570 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

210 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 287.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 570 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 570 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GeForce 210 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 54 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 73 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.