GeForce 930M vs Radeon Pro 560X

Place in the ranking	463	815
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.74	5.47
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	GM108
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	16 July 2018 (6 years ago)	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	384
Core clock speed	1004 MHz	549 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	549 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	64.26	13.18
Floating-point processing power	2.056 TFLOPS	0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	64	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
GPU Boost	no data	2.0
Optimus	-	+
GameWorks	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7 (5.1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.55
+263%

GeForce 930M 2.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
+263%

GeForce 930M 1013

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560X 7590
+253%

GeForce 930M 2153

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560X 5699
+290%

GeForce 930M 1461

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 32449
+291%

GeForce 930M 8309

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro 560X 17538
+245%

GeForce 930M 5087

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Pro 560X 17037
+292%

GeForce 930M 4341

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	41 +128%	18 −128%
1440p	39 +290%	10−12 −290%
4K	12 +300%	3−4 −300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+200%

5−6

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +288%	8−9 −288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Battlefield 5	49 +1125%	4−5 −1125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 +383%	6−7 −383%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Far Cry 5	28 +460%	5−6 −460%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +443%	7−8 −443%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +392%	12−14 −392%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Metro Exodus	41 +1950%	2−3 −1950%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 +177%	13 −177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +418%	10−12 −418%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +63.2%	35−40 −63.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 +525%	8−9 −525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Battlefield 5	42 +950%	4−5 −950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	25 +317%	6−7 −317%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Far Cry 5	26 +420%	5−6 −420%
Far Cry New Dawn	28 +300%	7−8 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +392%	12−14 −392%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Metro Exodus	33 +1550%	2−3 −1550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 +383%	6−7 −383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +182%	10−12 −182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +8.3%	24 −8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +63.2%	35−40 −63.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 +75%	8−9 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 +200%	6−7 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Far Cry 5	19 +280%	5−6 −280%
Forza Horizon 4	36 +177%	12−14 −177%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +182%	10−12 −182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +186%	7 −186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +63.2%	35−40 −63.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

25
+317%

6−7

−317%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +310%	10−11 −310%
Hitman 3	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +300%	14−16 −300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16
+167%

6−7

−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

This is how Pro 560X and GeForce 930M compete in popular games:

Pro 560X is 128% faster in 1080p
Pro 560X is 290% faster in 1440p
Pro 560X is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 560X is 1950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 560X surpassed GeForce 930M in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.55	2.63
Recency	16 July 2018	13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	33 Watt

Pro 560X has a 263.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 930M, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 930M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.