Radeon RX 7950 XT vs Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking230not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25605376
Boost clock speed1265 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate164.81,008
Floating-point processing power5.274 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data20 GB/s
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

Pro 5600M has 500% lower power consumption.

RX 7950 XT, on the other hand, has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5600M and Radeon RX 7950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7950 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
Radeon RX 7950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 74 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.