Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.72
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.02
+13.9%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Pro 5600M by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking238208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.0853.84
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 12AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1000 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8129.6
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Valorant 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Dota 2 80−85
−8.4%
90−95
+8.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Fortnite 120−130
−6.6%
130−140
+6.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−8.4%
90−95
+8.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−11.1%
170−180
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−10.4%
85−90
+10.4%
Valorant 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
World of Tanks 250−260
−10.7%
280−290
+10.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Dota 2 80−85
−8.4%
90−95
+8.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−11.1%
170−180
+11.1%
Valorant 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−8.6%
190−200
+8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
World of Tanks 160−170
−12.5%
180−190
+12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Dota 2 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Valorant 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.72 27.02
Recency 15 June 2020 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.