Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon Pro 5600M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, including specs and performance data.
B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms Pro 5600M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 284 | 266 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 34.27 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Navi 12 | no data |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 June 2020 (5 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 12 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.274 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | no data |
| TMUs | 160 | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 75−80
−5.3%
| 79
+5.3%
|
| 1440p | 30−35
−20%
| 36
+20%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
−3.9%
|
130−140
+3.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−4.1%
|
50−55
+4.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
−3.9%
|
130−140
+3.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−4.1%
|
50−55
+4.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
−4.1%
|
75−80
+4.1%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
−2.6%
|
110−120
+2.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
−4.2%
|
75−80
+4.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
−4.5%
|
90−95
+4.5%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
−3.1%
|
160−170
+3.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
−3.9%
|
130−140
+3.9%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
−2%
|
250−260
+2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−4.1%
|
50−55
+4.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
−0.8%
|
120−130
+0.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
−4.1%
|
75−80
+4.1%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
−2.6%
|
110−120
+2.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
−4.2%
|
75−80
+4.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+5.1%
|
79
−5.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
−4%
|
50−55
+4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
−4.5%
|
90−95
+4.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
−6.1%
|
70−75
+6.1%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
−3.1%
|
160−170
+3.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−4.1%
|
50−55
+4.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
−0.8%
|
120−130
+0.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
−4.1%
|
75−80
+4.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
−3.3%
|
90−95
+3.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
−4.3%
|
45−50
+4.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
−4.5%
|
90−95
+4.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
−6.1%
|
70−75
+6.1%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 110−120
−2.6%
|
110−120
+2.6%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
−4.2%
|
50−55
+4.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
−4.3%
|
160−170
+4.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
+32.3%
|
31
−32.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
−6.7%
|
30−35
+6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
−3.4%
|
180−190
+3.4%
|
| Valorant | 190−200
−2%
|
200−210
+2%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−3.1%
|
65−70
+3.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
−3.8%
|
50−55
+3.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−5.2%
|
60−65
+5.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
−4%
|
24−27
+4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
−5.6%
|
35−40
+5.6%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
−5.6%
|
55−60
+5.6%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20−22
+5.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−5.3%
|
130−140
+5.3%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−5.7%
|
35−40
+5.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 75−80
+1.3%
|
75−80
−1.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−7.7%
|
27−30
+7.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−2.5%
|
40−45
+2.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
This is how Pro 5600M and Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 5% faster in 1080p
- Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 20% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 32% faster.
- in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 8% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro 5600M performs better in 2 tests (3%)
- Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 56 tests (95%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.30 | 23.24 |
| Recency | 15 June 2020 | 5 January 2026 |
Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 4.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5600M and Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
