GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon Pro 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560 with GeForce GTX 675MX, including specs and performance data.

Pro 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.04
+28%

Pro 560 outperforms GTX 675MX by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking483554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.304.86
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 21GK104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024960
Core clock speed907 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate58.0552.32
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS1.256 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560 9.04
+28%
GTX 675MX 7.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560 3475
+27.9%
GTX 675MX 2716

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560 5305
+33.3%
GTX 675MX 3979

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 560 18982
+0.2%
GTX 675MX 18950

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560 3892
+37.5%
GTX 675MX 2831

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560 23105
+13.7%
GTX 675MX 20325

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro 560 15532
+45.3%
GTX 675MX 10688

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+20%
50
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Elden Ring 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Dota 2 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Elden Ring 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%
Fortnite 50−55
+26.2%
40−45
−26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+24.6%
55−60
−24.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
World of Tanks 130−140
+1.5%
131
−1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Dota 2 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+24.6%
55−60
−24.6%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Elden Ring 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
World of Tanks 65−70
+27.5%
50−55
−27.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Valorant 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Elden Ring 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Fortnite 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Valorant 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how Pro 560 and GTX 675MX compete in popular games:

  • Pro 560 is 20% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 560 is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 560 is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.04 7.06
Recency 18 April 2017 1 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

Pro 560 has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675MX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 675MX is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 113 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.