GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro 555

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking511not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 21G84
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (7 years ago)5 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed850 MHz470 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate40.807.520
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.06016 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz635 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s20.32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 5 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

Pro 555 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

8600M GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.