AeroBox GPU vs Radeon Pro 555
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 511 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 7.57 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | Kryptos |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 13 March 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 935 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 985 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 55.16 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.306 TFLOPS | 1.765 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 68.22 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 June 2017 | 13 March 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Pro 555 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation card while AeroBox GPU is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
