Radeon Pro W5300M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 May 2020 (5 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121280
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60100.0
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.1.971.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2020 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7
Iris Plus Graphics G7
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M
Radeon Pro W5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 65 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 or Radeon Pro W5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.