GeForce GT 555M 3 GB vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking248not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.51no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNavi 14GF106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)24 March 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536144
Core clock speed1187 MHz590 MHz
Boost clock speed1757 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate168.714.16
Floating-point processing power5.398 TFLOPS0.3398 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs9624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s43.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 24 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

Pro 5500 XT has an age advantage of 9 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GT 555M 3 GB, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5500 XT and GeForce GT 555M 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation card while GeForce GT 555M 3 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M 3 GB
GeForce GT 555M 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 66 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 555M 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.