Radeon Pro 5300 vs Pro 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with Radeon Pro 5300, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.58

Pro 5300 outperforms Pro 5300M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345299
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.6515.08
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801280
Core clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0132.0
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPS4.224 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5300M 15.58
Pro 5300 18.58
+19.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5300M 5989
Pro 5300 7143
+19.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Elden Ring 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Valorant 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Dota 2 55−60
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Elden Ring 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Fortnite 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−17.1%
130−140
+17.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Valorant 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%
World of Tanks 190−200
−15.6%
230−240
+15.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Dota 2 55−60
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−17.1%
130−140
+17.1%
Valorant 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Elden Ring 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−12.7%
160−170
+12.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
World of Tanks 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Valorant 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Dota 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Elden Ring 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Fortnite 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Valorant 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.58 18.58
Recency 13 November 2019 4 August 2020

Pro 5300 has a 19.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Radeon Pro 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.