Radeon RX 7400 vs Pro 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking533not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameBaffinNavi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date30 October 2016 (8 years ago)8 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241792
Core clock speed850 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speed907 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate58.05257.6
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2016 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 43 Watt

Pro 460 has 22.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon RX 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro 460
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 36 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 460 or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.