GeForce 7150M vs Radeon Pro 455

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	484	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.41	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	no data
GPU code name	Polaris 11	C67
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 October 2016 (7 years ago)	1 February 2006 (18 years ago)
Current price	$696	$163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	3
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	425 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	90 nm
Texture fill rate	41.04	no data
Floating-point performance	1,313 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 455 and GeForce 7150M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	shared Memory
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 October 2016	1 February 2006
Chip lithography	14 nm	90 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---