GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon Pro 450
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 450 with GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.
570 Rev. 2 outperforms Pro 450 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 612 | 610 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.92 |
| Power efficiency | 14.27 | 2.30 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | GF110 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 October 2016 (9 years ago) | 7 December 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 40 |
| TMUs | 40 | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 640 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1270 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 152.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
+3.7%
| 27−30
−3.7%
|
| 4K | 19
+5.6%
| 18−20
−5.6%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 12.93 |
| 4K | no data | 19.39 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+4.3%
|
70−75
−4.3%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+8%
|
100−105
−8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+4%
|
50−55
−4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+9.5%
|
21−24
−9.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+4.3%
|
70−75
−4.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30
−3.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 67
+3.1%
|
65−70
−3.1%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+4.3%
|
70−75
−4.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
+2%
|
50−55
−2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+11.4%
|
35−40
−11.4%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+5.7%
|
70−75
−5.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+13.3%
|
30−33
−13.3%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how Pro 450 and GTX 570 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:
- Pro 450 is 4% faster in 1080p
- Pro 450 is 6% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.48 | 6.53 |
| Recency | 30 October 2016 | 7 December 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 219 Watt |
Pro 450 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 525.7% lower power consumption.
GTX 570 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 450 and GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 450 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
