Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs Picasso

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated68
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data90.25
Power efficiencyno data19.78
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code namePicassoNavi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Core clock speed300 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate52.04352.8
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs40144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 170 Watt

Picasso has 1600% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Picasso and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Picasso
Radeon Picasso
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Picasso on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 40 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.