ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 9100 with Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 9100
2017, $1,599
16 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
28.34
+8756%

PRO 9100 outperforms Mobility HD 2600 XT by a whopping 8756% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2251382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.77no data
Power efficiency9.49no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10M76
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 July 2017 (8 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096120
Core clock speed1200 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate384.05.440
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS0.1632 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2568
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s24 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 26 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.34 0.32
Recency 10 July 2017 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

PRO WX 9100 has a 8756.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO WX 9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Radeon PRO WX 9100
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.