GeForce GT 1030 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Place in performance ranking	158	544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	26
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.29	2.41
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Vega 10	N17P-G1
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	10 July 2017 (6 years ago)	17 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,599	$79
Current price	$1880 (1.2x MSRP)	$137 (1.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO WX 9100 has 244% better value for money than GT 1030.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	384
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1228 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1670 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	384.0	35.23
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops	1,127 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 9100 32.28
+406%

GT 1030 6.38

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 406% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO WX 9100 12464
+406%

GT 1030 2465

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 406% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

PRO WX 9100 64683
+566%

GT 1030 9717

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 566% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO WX 9100 67932
+623%

GT 1030 9396

Radeon PRO WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 623% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120−130 +400%	24 −400%
1440p	85−90 +400%	17 −400%
4K	45−50 +400%	9 −400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

75−80
+400%

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +400%	18 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +400%	22 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +400%	18 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +400%	11 −400%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +376%	21 −376%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 +381%	27 −381%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +381%	27 −381%
Hitman 3	80−85 +400%	16 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +400%	42 −400%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +400%	26 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +384%	31 −384%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +400%	28 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +400%	13 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +400%	12 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +400%	18−20 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +400%	16 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +400%	7 −400%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +400%	20 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +376%	84 −376%
Hitman 3	40−45 +400%	8 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	600−650 +388%	123 −388%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +376%	21 −376%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +400%	24 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +400%	19 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +376%	21 −376%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +376%	84 −376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +400%	7 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +380%	5 −380%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +400%	16 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +400%	19 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +400%	16 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +400%	12 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +400%	6 −400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+400%

−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Hitman 3	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14 −400%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +400%	11 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+400%

10−12

−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +350%	4 −350%
Hitman 3	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +400%	2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +400%	7 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +380%	5 −380%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%