GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, including specs and performance data.
1050 Mobile 3 GB outperforms PRO 3100 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 614 | 446 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.36 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.22 | 11.59 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Lexa | GP107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 February 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1366 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1442 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,200 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 69.22 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.248 TFLOPS | 2.215 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 84.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 14
−71.4%
| 24−27
+71.4%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 14.21 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−77.4%
|
55−60
+77.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−85.2%
|
50−55
+85.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−77.4%
|
55−60
+77.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−75%
|
35−40
+75%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−84.2%
|
70−75
+84.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−78.6%
|
50−55
+78.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
−66.7%
|
30−33
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−71.4%
|
120−130
+71.4%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−85.2%
|
50−55
+85.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−77.4%
|
55−60
+77.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−84.5%
|
190−200
+84.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−75%
|
35−40
+75%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−84.2%
|
70−75
+84.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−78.6%
|
50−55
+78.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
−66.7%
|
30−33
+66.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40−45
+81.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−71.4%
|
120−130
+71.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−85.2%
|
50−55
+85.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−80%
|
90−95
+80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−75%
|
35−40
+75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−78.6%
|
50−55
+78.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−71.4%
|
120−130
+71.4%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40
−84.2%
|
70−75
+84.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−77.1%
|
85−90
+77.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−84.2%
|
70−75
+84.2%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−71.4%
|
120−130
+71.4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−80%
|
18−20
+80%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−80%
|
27−30
+80%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
−66.7%
|
30−33
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−71.9%
|
55−60
+71.9%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40−45
+81.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
This is how PRO WX 3100 and GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB compete in popular games:
- GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is 71% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.83 | 10.80 |
| Recency | 12 June 2017 | 1 February 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
PRO WX 3100 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 15.4% lower power consumption.
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 85.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 3100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
