GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking561not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.13no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)no data
GPU code namePolaris 12no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.01no data
Floating-point processing power1.248 gflopsno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

PRO WX 3100 11702
+9262%
9400M GeForceBoost 125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2017 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

PRO WX 3100 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 47 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.