FirePro M4000 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 3100 with FirePro M4000, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 3100
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
6.69
+61.2%

PRO WX 3100 outperforms M4000 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking565689
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.08no data
Power efficiency7.108.68
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameLexaChelsea
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)27 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed925 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0121.60
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-A
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
StereoOutput3D-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 3100 6.69
+61.2%
FirePro M4000 4.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 3100 2573
+61.3%
FirePro M4000 1595

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

PRO WX 3100 3691
+86.3%
FirePro M4000 1981

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

PRO WX 3100 11702
+35.6%
FirePro M4000 8628

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

PRO WX 3100 2671
+55.9%
FirePro M4000 1713

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

PRO WX 3100 18522
+47.2%
FirePro M4000 12587

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

PRO WX 3100 7624
+37.8%
FirePro M4000 5532

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−92.3%
25
+92.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Elden Ring 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Valorant 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Dota 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Elden Ring 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Fortnite 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+52.8%
35−40
−52.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
World of Tanks 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
−48.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Dota 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+52.8%
35−40
−52.8%
Valorant 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Elden Ring 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
World of Tanks 45−50
+65.5%
27−30
−65.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Elden Ring 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Valorant 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how PRO WX 3100 and FirePro M4000 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M4000 is 92% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the PRO WX 3100 is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • PRO WX 3100 is ahead in 59 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.69 4.15
Recency 12 June 2017 27 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 33 Watt

PRO WX 3100 has a 61.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M4000, on the other hand, has 97% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO WX 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a workstation card while FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
Radeon PRO WX 3100
AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 56 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.