Radeon RX 6600 XT vs PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO WX 2100
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.73

RX 6600 XT outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 802% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking61378
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.9848.36
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 12Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2018 (6 years ago)30 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $379
Current price$343 (2.3x MSRP)$283 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 1523% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speedno data1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate39.01331.4
Floating-point performance1,248 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 2100 4.73
RX 6600 XT 42.67
+802%

RX 6600 XT outperforms PRO WX 2100 by 802% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO WX 2100 1827
RX 6600 XT 16486
+802%

RX 6600 XT outperforms PRO WX 2100 by 802% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−814%
128
+814%
1440p8−9
−838%
75
+838%
4K4−5
−925%
41
+925%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−888%
79
+888%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−3125%
129
+3125%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1042%
130−140
+1042%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−875%
78
+875%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−708%
100−110
+708%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1100%
108
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1056%
289
+1056%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1375%
110−120
+1375%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1412%
257
+1412%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−471%
120
+471%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−2550%
106
+2550%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1042%
130−140
+1042%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−850%
76
+850%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−708%
100−110
+708%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Hitman 3 9−10
−944%
94
+944%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−596%
170−180
+596%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−700%
64
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1129%
209
+1129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1660%
176
+1660%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−386%
100−110
+386%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1775%
75
+1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−763%
69
+763%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−528%
157
+528%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−976%
183
+976%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−890%
99
+890%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−190%
61
+190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−822%
80−85
+822%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1400%
105
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Hitman 3 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−955%
116
+955%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4800%
98
+4800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−722%
70−75
+722%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1333%
40−45
+1333%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5300%
54
+5300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1220%
66
+1220%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−783%
53
+783%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 814% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 838% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 925% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 5300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed PRO WX 2100 in all 69 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.73 42.67
Recency 21 March 2018 30 July 2021
Cost $149 $379
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 160 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 36 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3808 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.