ATI Radeon 7200 vs PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6561549
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.49no data
Power efficiency9.45no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameLexaR100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed925 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate39.011
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs326

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1862
+93000%
ATI 7200 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 no data
Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Fortnite 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 no data
Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Fortnite 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2017 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 23 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 52.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.