GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.15

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 848% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65278
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.58no data
Power efficiency9.4527.26
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLexaAD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072
Core clock speed925 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01181.4
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 2100 4.15
RTX 4060 Mobile 39.36
+848%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 1856
RTX 4060 Mobile 17598
+848%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1030%
113
+1030%
1440p6−7
−950%
63
+950%
4K4−5
−875%
39
+875%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.90no data
1440p24.83no data
4K37.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−1273%
151
+1273%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−926%
195
+926%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1267%
123
+1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−1009%
122
+1009%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−672%
130−140
+672%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−926%
195
+926%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1000%
99
+1000%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−967%
128
+967%
Fortnite 24−27
−596%
180−190
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−676%
160−170
+676%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−1145%
137
+1145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−806%
160−170
+806%
Valorant 55−60
−316%
240−250
+316%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−645%
82
+645%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−672%
130−140
+672%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−668%
146
+668%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−256%
270−280
+256%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−833%
84
+833%
Dota 2 35−40
−321%
164
+321%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−975%
129
+975%
Fortnite 24−27
−596%
180−190
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−676%
160−170
+676%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−1036%
125
+1036%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−840%
141
+840%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−213%
25
+213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−806%
160−170
+806%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1369%
191
+1369%
Valorant 55−60
−316%
240−250
+316%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−672%
130−140
+672%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−756%
77
+756%
Dota 2 35−40
−300%
156
+300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−942%
125
+942%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−676%
160−170
+676%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−806%
160−170
+806%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−677%
101
+677%
Valorant 55−60
−316%
240−250
+316%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−596%
180−190
+596%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−1533%
98
+1533%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−762%
290−300
+762%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1867%
59
+1867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−430%
170−180
+430%
Valorant 45−50
−451%
270−280
+451%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1125%
98
+1125%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1027%
120−130
+1027%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−986%
76
+986%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−1167%
110−120
+1167%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−375%
76
+375%
Valorant 21−24
−1013%
250−260
+1013%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
Dota 2 14−16
−740%
126
+740%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1040%
55−60
+1040%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 1030% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 875% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 6700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.15 39.36
Recency 4 June 2017 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 115 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has 228.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 848.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3623 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.