GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking635not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.16no data
Power efficiency9.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLexaGA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $1,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51210752
Core clock speed925 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01569.5
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS36.45 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm336 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz21.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s1,018 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER
GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 37 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 422 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.