GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO WX 2100 with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, including specs and performance data.

PRO WX 2100
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
4.22

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 1341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking68732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9528.34
Power efficiency9.7113.97
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLexaGA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 June 2017 (8 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 3080 Ti has 2883% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51210240
Core clock speed925 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01532.8
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS34.1 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L1 Cache128 KB10 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s912.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO WX 2100 4.22
RTX 3080 Ti 60.80
+1341%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO WX 2100 Samples: 221 1868
RTX 3080 Ti Samples: 13504 26883
+1339%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−1436%
215
+1436%
1440p9−10
−1500%
144
+1500%
4K6−7
−1500%
96
+1500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.64
−90.8%
5.58
+90.8%
1440p16.56
−98.8%
8.33
+98.8%
4K24.83
−98.8%
12.49
+98.8%
  • RTX 3080 Ti has 91% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti has 99% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti has 99% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−1440%
300−350
+1440%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−2333%
219
+2333%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−1460%
150−160
+1460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−867%
170−180
+867%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−1440%
300−350
+1440%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1944%
184
+1944%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1386%
208
+1386%
Fortnite 27−30
−1019%
300−350
+1019%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1119%
250−260
+1119%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1567%
200
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−1460%
150−160
+1460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−872%
170−180
+872%
Valorant 55−60
−531%
350−400
+531%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−867%
170−180
+867%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−1440%
300−350
+1440%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−252%
270−280
+252%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1678%
160
+1678%
Dota 2 35−40
−500%
234
+500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1314%
198
+1314%
Fortnite 27−30
−1019%
300−350
+1019%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1119%
250−260
+1119%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1467%
188
+1467%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1060%
174
+1060%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−1460%
150−160
+1460%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−2050%
172
+2050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−872%
170−180
+872%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2762%
372
+2762%
Valorant 55−60
−531%
350−400
+531%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−989%
196
+989%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1522%
146
+1522%
Dota 2 35−40
−456%
217
+456%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1229%
186
+1229%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1119%
250−260
+1119%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−1460%
150−160
+1460%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−872%
170−180
+872%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1292%
181
+1292%
Valorant 55−60
−569%
388
+569%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−1019%
300−350
+1019%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2089%
190−200
+2089%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−1349%
500−550
+1349%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−2960%
153
+2960%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3700%
114
+3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Valorant 45−50
−822%
450−500
+822%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−6300%
192
+6300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3200%
99
+3200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2100%
176
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1620%
85−90
+1620%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2467%
150−160
+2467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−1578%
150−160
+1578%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−971%
182
+971%
Valorant 21−24
−1335%
300−350
+1335%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13500%
136
+13500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%
Dota 2 14−16
−1307%
211
+1307%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3533%
109
+3533%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2767%
170−180
+2767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+0%
152
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how PRO WX 2100 and RTX 3080 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti is 1436% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti is 1500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3080 Ti is 13500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti performs better in 60 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.22 60.80
Recency 4 June 2017 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 1340.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 54 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12001 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 2100 or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.