GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking642not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.84no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 12GF116
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 March 2018 (6 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512144
Core clock speedno data720 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0117.28
Floating-point processing power1.248 gflops0.4147 gflops
ROPs1624
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s38.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2018 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

PRO WX 2100 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 36 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.