FirePro V5800 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

Place in performance ranking	609	672
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	3.02	0.36
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	Juniper
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 March 2018 (6 years old)	26 April 2010 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$479
Current price	$343 (2.3x MSRP)	$354 (0.7x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO WX 2100 has 739% better value for money than ATI V5800.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	800
Core clock speed	no data	690 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,200 million	1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	74 Watt
Texture fill rate	39.01	27.60
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	1,104.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO WX 2100 and FirePro V5800 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO WX 2100 4.73
+29.6%

ATI V5800 3.65

Radeon PRO WX 2100 outperforms FirePro V5800 by 30% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO WX 2100 1832
+29.5%

ATI V5800 1415

Radeon PRO WX 2100 outperforms FirePro V5800 by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Hitman 3	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Hitman 3	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Hitman 3	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	4.73	3.65
Recency	21 March 2018	26 April 2010
Cost	$149	$479
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	74 Watt