Radeon 8060S vs PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7900 with Radeon 8060S, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7900
2023
48 GB GDDR6, 295 Watt
67.44
+59.9%

PRO W7900 outperforms 8060S by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.41no data
Power efficiency17.4258.45
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 31Strix Halo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (2 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61442560
Core clock speed1855 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2495 MHz2335 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate958.1373.6
Floating-point processing power61.32 TFLOPS11.96 TFLOPS
ROPs19264
TMUs384160
Ray Tracing Cores9640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7900 67.44
+59.9%
Radeon 8060S 42.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7900 28261
+59.9%
Radeon 8060S 17677

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+50.9%
106
−50.9%
1440p90−95
+57.9%
57
−57.9%
4K55−60
+52.8%
36
−52.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.99no data
1440p44.43no data
4K72.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
God of War 117
+0%
117
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+0%
215
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 201
+0%
201
+0%
God of War 96
+0%
96
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 182
+0%
182
+0%
God of War 76
+0%
76
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+0%
127
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 218
+0%
218
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
God of War 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 114
+0%
114
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
God of War 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
God of War 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how PRO W7900 and Radeon 8060S compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 51% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 58% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 53% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 67.44 42.18
Recency 13 April 2023 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 55 Watt

PRO W7900 has a 59.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 8060S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 436.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8060S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8060S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 87 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 40 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7900 or Radeon 8060S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.