Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon PRO W7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7700 and Arc Pro B50, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO W7700
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
52.43
+75.8%

PRO W7700 outperforms Pro B50 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.7447.44
Power efficiency22.2434.34
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2023 (1 year ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B50 has 49% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed1900 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate499.2332.8
Floating-point processing power31.95 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs192128
Ray Tracing Cores4816
L0 Cache768 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length241 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.14x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7700 52.43
+75.8%
Arc Pro B50 29.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7700 23183
+75.8%
Samples: 73
Arc Pro B50 13186
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.43 29.82
Recency 13 November 2023 5 September 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 70 Watt

PRO W7700 has a 75.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B50 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7700 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.