Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

PRO W7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
46.75
+46.2%

PRO W7600 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking62162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation74.723.14
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 33Vega
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)14 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $399
Current price$579 (1x MSRP)$4999 (12.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7600 has 2280% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speedno data1247 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate312.3280.0
Floating-point performanceno data9,677 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s786 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s402.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7600 46.75
+46.2%
Pro Vega 56 31.98

PRO W7600 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

PRO W7600 18057
+46.2%
Pro Vega 56 12353

PRO W7600 outperforms Pro Vega 56 by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+38.6%
101
−38.6%
4K95−100
+46.2%
65
−46.2%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.75 31.98
Recency 3 August 2023 14 December 2017
Cost $599 $399
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 210 Watt

The Radeon PRO W7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 56 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.