Quadro P5200 vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Quadro P5200, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
30.17
+14.2%

PRO W7500 outperforms P5200 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO W7500 PRO W7500
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking190231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.08no data
Power efficiency34.8921.38
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 33GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed1500 MHz1556 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1746 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4279.4
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS8.94 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112160
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB960 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s230.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7500 30.17
+14.2%
Quadro P5200 26.41

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 13338
+14.2%
Samples: 96
Quadro P5200 11678
Samples: 192

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+8.3%
120
−8.3%
4K50−55
+4.2%
48
−4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.30no data
4K8.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and Quadro P5200 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7500 is 8% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7500 is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.17 26.41
Recency 3 August 2023 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 100 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Quadro P5200, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
PRO W7500 Radeon PRO W7500
vs
L20 L20
RX 640 OEM 640 OEM
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile 5080 Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile NVIDIA PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU Apple Max 40-Core GPU
vs
RX 7900 GRE 7900 GRE
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
RX 7600 7600
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
PRO W7500 W7500
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 5000 Blackwell
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB
vs
RTX 5090 5090
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile NVIDIA PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 5070 5070
ROG Ally Extreme GPU AMD Ally Extreme GPU
vs
ROG Ally GPU GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 22 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 108 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Quadro P5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.