Quadro P4000 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Quadro P4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
30.17
+72.1%

PRO W7500 outperforms P4000 Mobile by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.112.97
Power efficiency34.8114.16
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 33GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2023 (2 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $819.61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

PRO W7500 has 1217% better value for money than P4000 Mobile.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921792
Core clock speed1500 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1228 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4137.4
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS4.398 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112112
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB672 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.21.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.17 17.53
Recency 3 August 2023 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 6 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 100 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 72.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Quadro P4000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 22 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 31 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Quadro P4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.