Mobility Radeon 9200 vs PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation83.17no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 33M9
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data
Current price$409 (1x MSRP)$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17925
Core clock speedno data1 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate190.40.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO W7500 and Mobility Radeon 9200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10.8 GB/s400 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s14.72 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 150 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and Mobility Radeon 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon 9200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Mobility Radeon 9200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.