GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO W7500

Place in the ranking	121	133
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Power efficiency	37.10	31.11
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 33	TU104B
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$429	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2944
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1095 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	190.4	201.5
Floating-point processing power	12.19 TFLOPS	6.447 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	184
Tensor Cores	no data	368
Ray Tracing Cores	28	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	216 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1344 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.0 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO W7500 37.57
+4.3%

RTX 2080 Max-Q 36.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 14497
+4.3%

RTX 2080 Max-Q 13894

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 −2.7%	113 +2.7%
1440p	75−80 +1.4%	74 −1.4%
4K	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.90	no data
1440p	5.72	no data
4K	7.80	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	81 +0%	81 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Battlefield 5	142 +0%	142 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95 +0%	95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	117 +0%	117 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	139 +0%	139 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	271 +0%	271 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	137 +0%	137 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95 +0%	95 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	174 +0%	174 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Battlefield 5	130 +0%	130 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	92 +0%	92 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	90 +0%	90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	102 +0%	102 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	223 +0%	223 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	120 +0%	120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	64 +0%	64 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +0%	56 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	71 +0%	71 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	67 +0%	67 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Hitman 3	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	78 +0%	78 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	88 +0%	88 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	69 +0%	69 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	47 +0%	47 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	51 +0%	51 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	224 +0%	224 +0%
Hitman 3	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40 +0%	40 +0%
Hitman 3	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	36 +0%	36 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 +0%	53 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +0%	31 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Far Cry 5	27 +0%	27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

This is how PRO W7500 and RTX 2080 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Max-Q is 3% faster in 1080p
PRO W7500 is 1% faster in 1440p
PRO W7500 is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.57	36.01
Recency	3 August 2023	29 January 2019
Chip lithography	6 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	80 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon PRO W7500 and GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.