Arctic Sound-M vs Radeon PRO W7500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency37.27no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 33Arctic Sound
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (1 year ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17928192
Core clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4230.4
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 500 Watt

PRO W7500 has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.