Quadro P2200 vs Radeon Instinct MI25

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Instinct MI25 and Quadro P2200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Instinct MI25
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
9.96

P2200 outperforms MI25 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking472280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.6822.76
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10GP106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)10 June 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×21280
Core clock speed1400 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0 ×2119.4
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS ×23.822 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×240
TMUs256 ×280
L1 Cache1 MB480 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm201 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×25 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2160 Bit
Memory clock speed852 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth436.2 GB/s ×2200.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Instinct MI25 9.96
Quadro P2200 21.18
+113%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Instinct MI25 4403
Samples: 8
Quadro P2200 9367
+113%
Samples: 1315

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Instinct MI25 68562
+112%
Quadro P2200 32349

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Instinct MI25 71503
+129%
Quadro P2200 31286

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 21.18
Recency 27 June 2017 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 75 Watt

Instinct MI25 has a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 112.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI25 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Radeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 430 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct MI25 or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.