HD Graphics 12EU vs Radeon Instinct MI200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 2.0 (2021)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameAldebaranIronlake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateDecember 2021 (2 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores665696
Core clock speed1000 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors58,200 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate707.26.396
Floating-point processing power22.63 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUs41612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16QPI
WidthOAM ModuleIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,638 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A10.1
Shader ModelN/A4.1
OpenGLN/A2.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

Instinct MI200 has a 650% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 12EU, on the other hand, has 757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI200 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI200
Radeon Instinct MI200
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.