GeForce RTX 5090 D vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15831
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.31
Power efficiencyno data13.26
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRS200GB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores221760
Core clock speed183 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed180 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors30 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data575 Watt
Texture fill rate0.371,636.8
Floating-point processing powerno data104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs2176
TMUs2680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 340M 2
RTX 5090 D 42305
+2115150%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 30 January 2025
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm

RTX 5090 D has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340M and GeForce RTX 5090 D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 D is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
GeForce RTX 5090 D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1694 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340M or GeForce RTX 5090 D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.