HD Graphics P4600 vs Radeon HD 8970M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8970M with HD Graphics P4600, including specs and performance data.

HD 8970M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.25
+542%

HD 8970M outperforms HD Graphics P4600 by a whopping 542% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4881009
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.051.31
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameNeptuneHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280160
Core clock speed850 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt84 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0024.00
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs322
TMUs8020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8970M 9.25
+542%
HD Graphics P4600 1.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8970M 3876
+541%
HD Graphics P4600 605

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+563%
8−9
−563%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
God of War 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Fortnite 55−60
+613%
8−9
−613%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
God of War 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Valorant 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 148
+605%
21−24
−605%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Dota 2 65−70
+580%
10−11
−580%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Fortnite 55−60
+613%
8−9
−613%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
God of War 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Grand Theft Auto V 39
+550%
6−7
−550%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
Valorant 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Dota 2 65−70
+580%
10−11
−580%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
God of War 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Valorant 90−95
+550%
14−16
−550%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+613%
8−9
−613%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Valorant 100−110
+550%
16−18
−550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
God of War 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
God of War 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

This is how HD 8970M and HD Graphics P4600 compete in popular games:

  • HD 8970M is 563% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.25 1.44
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 84 Watt

HD 8970M has a 542.4% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics P4600, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 19% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8970M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Radeon HD 8970M
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 49 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8970M or HD Graphics P4600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.